Kol Nidrei: The Zionists Favorite Jewish Prayer

I haven’t personally studied the Talmud. Do Jews actually state their intent to decieve every year? It looks like they do! Is this what “the truth is no defense” is about?

Kol Nidrei: “The Anti-Semite’s Favorite Jewish Prayer”

Every year in October people like Michael Weiss (see below) and a slew of other rabbinic apologists spin Yom Kippur’s Kol Nidrei (also spelled “Nidre”) absolution of vows into a “context”-based confutation of assertions that it allows Talmudists to cheat in business, politics and religion by permitting them to break their future oaths and promises; which indeed it does, a fact made plain by the belief and more importantly — the record of behavior throughout history of not only the am-ha’aretz (“ignorant Jews”), but the theological, governmental and commercial elite among the adherents of Orthodox Judaism.

Unquestionably, the public relations-savvy Reform Judaism –the equivalent of Unitarianism in Christianity–has eschewed Kol Nidrei, since they regard it as too blatant an indicator of rabbinic deceit to be salvaged.

In my book Judaism Discovered, on pp. 965-980, I refute every major defense of Kol Nidrei: that it refers only to past vows, oaths and promises; that it constitutes only pious penitence for failing to keep these; or that the nullification of oaths and vows is confined to the realm of the “personal” (as Weiss asserts – as if lying on only a “personal” basis is somehow exculpatory).

Get the Truth

This is what Lesley Hughes was kicked out of the Liberal Party for. Telling the truth.

Get the Truth -by Lesley Hughes

Last week Canada revealed itself once again as a truly unique nation. In a world where dead warriors are commonplace and taken for granted, this country stopped, paid attention, lowered the flags and gave full military honours to four soldiers, who died inexplicably and tragically at the hands of our allies.

We all felt the shock and the sorrow. The corporate media, privately owned newspapers, television and radio chains lingered especially on the pain and dignity of their survivors.

This was hard to swallow, coming from the same media that, in a fit of Me-Too-ism, couldn’t wait to send young Canadians into a war on terrorism, which they hardly bothered to investigate; the same media that show every willingness to sacrifice more lives and families without pausing to confront the most basic question Canadians want answered about Afghanistan. What, exactly, are we doing there?

Truth may have been the casualty of war in former ages, but this war is different. While major media busy themselves waving flags, a global network of independent journalists, who have no interests to protect, no secrets to hide, are tracking and documenting its development on a daily basis.

Among the best: the Web site The Emperor’s New Clothes (www.tenc.net) and Mike Ruppert, editor and publisher of From the Wilderness newsletter out of California (www.copvcia.com) .

Using and sharing only published and sourced news stories from world media, and official documents of various governments either leaked or available under freedom of information acts, these journalists have assembled a disturbing picture, which suggests CIA foreknowledge and complicity of highly placed officials in the U.S. government around the attacks on the World Trade Center Sept. 11.

Many official sources are claiming to have warned the American intelligence community, which spends $30 billion a year gathering information, about the attacks on the twin towers on that heartbreaking day.

German Intelligence (BND) claims to have warned the U.S. last June, the Israeli Mossad and Russian Intelligence in August. Israeli businesses, which had offices in the Towers, vacated the premises a week before the attacks, breaking their lease to do it. About 3000 Americans working there were not so lucky.

Ironically, the stock market was also warning anyone who cared to notice that something peculiar was afoot: in the week prior to Sept. 11, unknown speculator(s) were suddenly betting that the stocks of United Airlines and American Airlines were going to fall in value; the trades were placed through Deutschebank/AB Brown, a firm formerly managed by Buzzy-Krongard, now executive director of the CIA.

So far, no one has been bold enough to claim $2.5 million in profits. No serious search for the speculator is under way.

More important to Canadians, the facts uncovered by Internet journalism suggest that the war in Afghanistan has little to do with the attacks of Sept.11; that it’s the result of lengthy failed negotiations between American businessmen and the Taliban over access to drugs and oil.

Mike Ruppert, a former LAPD narcotics officer turned journalist, maintains that Wall Street, (from whom the CIA gets its strategists and directions) is heavily dependent on laundered drug money, which helps keep the Fortune 500 and the stock market afloat. The IMF recently estimated that about $1.5 trillion goes through the world’s banks every year, at least $500 billion of it from drugs.

His documents show that in January, 2001, the Taliban destroyed their opium crops, which normally supply 70 per cent of the world’s heroin. In May, the U.S. gave the Taliban $43 Million in mysterious aid. Sept. 11 was a turning point.

The U.S. bombed, invaded, captured the Taliban, and opium farms are now back in business. The Financial Times has reported that the next harvest will be a record breaking 4,500 tonnes, much of it headed to the U.S.A.

Ruppert and others have tracked the progress of an urgent pipeline, which American oilmen have been trying to build through Afghanistan since 1991. They stated publicly that they could not do it without a sympathetic Afghan government in place. Newly installed prime minister Hamid Karzai is a former employee of Unocal Oil.

Negotiations on the Central Asian pipeline resumed in October and an agreement to proceed with it was announced in February.

Ruppert also notes that Osama Bin Laden was treated for his chronic kidney disease at the American Hospital in Dubai last summer. Although wanted for the bombing of two U.S. embassies and eligible for execution by American agents, he flew away undisturbed. The sole coverage of these events in Canada has come from Barrie Zwicker, media critic at Vision TV.

If the work of Internet journalists is correct, then the war is neither a holy war, not a grand clash of civilizations between East and West, and our soldiers were lost to us and to their families to keep drugs and oil profits flowing in the U.S.

Until we know the truth, we should refuse to add one more Canadian body to the pile of dead in Afghanistan. Not one. Canada should get the truth or get out.

Lesley Hughes is a freelance writer and broadcaster in Winnipeg. Reprinted with permission. Since Lesley’s column on May 1, the mainstream media have at last also “discovered” elements of this deeper, more sinister, story.

Liberals: NDP Running Conspiracy Theorist

Unbelievable! You don’t have to go hunting for Zionofascism in Canada, it just walks up and slaps you in the face, repeatedly!

A press release at the Liberals website, is attacking NDP candidate Bev Collins for the crime of questioning 911.

Was this also at the behest of the Canadian Jewish Congress, like the Lesley Hughes termination?

Orwellian Lieberal press release follows:

http://www.teambc.ca/2008/09/25/ndp-running-conspiracy-theorist/

NDP Running Conspiracy Theorist

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

September 25, 2008

NDP RUNNING CONSPIRACY THEORIST

Bev Collins Views Insulting to Victims of 9-11

Jack Layton must be held to account for approving the candidacy of Bev Collins, a high profile conspiracy theorist and former Canadian Action Party (CAP) President and NDP candidate in Cariboo-Prince George.

Sadly, it appears that the NDP didn’t do any research when they recruited this controversial candidate, who even speaks at “9/11truth conferences.” When confronted with the possibility by the Vancouver Sun yesterday, NDP campaign manager Gerry Scott was quoted as saying “I’m sure she doesn’t believe that” (Vancouver Sun, 24 September 2008)

Here are the facts:

There are countless hours of video and audio that show exactly what Bev Collins really believes. (Links and transcripts attached) The local print media has also reported extensively on what Bev Collins believes. For example:

“With Rumsfeld, Rove, and now Gonzales out of the way, Bush is losing his support base faster than he can say Al-Qaida. Now officials are warning their fellow Americans and the world that Cheney and friends are planning to launch a 9/11-style attack on American soil within the coming months to bring about martial law and keep their hold on power. This could be ignored as a conspiracy, except for the high-calibre people who signed on to this public written warning including a former colonel and congresswoman.”

-Running for cover from all the conspiracy theories,” Prince George Citizen (31 August 2007)

.

“The CAP [Canadian Action Party, of which Collins was president] is launching an independent internal investigation,” she said. There’s so much complicity and questions surrounding that day. And now we’re being stripped of our rights and freedoms with anti-terrorism laws, rules and regulations

“Collins’ party happy with turnout North American union, potential war hot topics,” Cariboo Press (21 October 2007)

QUESTIONS:

Was Jack Layton aware of Ms. Collins’ views prior to her becoming an NDP candidate?

If not, now that Jack Layton has this information, will he repudiate or endorse the extreme views of this candidate?

Toronto 18 Scare-orism Scam Exploding in Zionists Faces

“From the first terrifying charges outlined by prosecutors to the
gritty, often comically deflated details that have emerged in court,
the case of the Toronto 18 seems to fit a well-established pattern in
terrorism prosecutions. Whether the result of trumped-up charges,
conflicting demands of intelligence agencies or difficulties of trying
cases where evidence is withheld by governments looking to protect
their sources and methods, numerous terrorism trials in the United
States and Europe have similarly foundered over the years.”

Yeah no shit, it is government scare-orism to support the terrorist imperial and police state policies of the neocon White House and their Israeli masters. The liquid bomb hoax fizzled similarly in Britain, and remember the Miami terrorist group that turned out to be nothing as well?

We are witnessing the internationally co-ordinated false accusations, and police agency entrapment of Muslims, to create sympathy for Zionists and their wars, and justify the anti-democratic ‘security certificates’, where the authorities don’t have to have proof, they can just disappear you.

Part of this is surely to misdirect people from understanding that Zionists where instrumental in the Sept 11 attacks.

But now as with the banking scandals(also Jew scams), the Zionist terror scams are falling apart. What will happen when the public realizes it is being taken for a ride with the government scare-orism?

The payback for the UberKikes is going to be enormous. How about a payback for ‘Nazi hunters’ like Simon Wiesenthals who persecuted old men for being guards. Now there will be no more ‘Nazi hunters’, persecuting Germans, it will be Zionist-hunters that will go after terrorist Jewry and their Goy puppets. Oh yes, we are in for interesting times indeed.

Full NYT story follows:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/25/world/americas/25canada.html

At Canada Terror Trial, the Accused Take on a Less Sinister Cast
September 24, 2008

BRAMPTON, Ontario — The story that first emerged about the 18 men and
teenagers, all Muslims, who were arrested in and around Toronto in
June 2006, was deeply disturbing. Police officials and prosecutors
told of plots to bomb government offices in Toronto and Ottawa as well
as a nuclear power station, and of a planned attack on Parliament with
the aim of capturing Prime Minister Stephen Harper and decapitating
him.

Zafar Bangash, an imam and commentator, spoke Wednesday in Toronto on
behalf of several suspects.

Charges were dropped this year against seven of the defendants. And
evidence presented at the first trial suggests that the group was long
on inflammatory talk about plots but short on the means and methods to
carry them out, and that it was aided — and perhaps provoked — by paid
police informants.

From the first terrifying charges outlined by prosecutors to the
gritty, often comically deflated details that have emerged in court,
the case of the Toronto 18 seems to fit a well-established pattern in
terrorism prosecutions. Whether the result of trumped-up charges,
conflicting demands of intelligence agencies or difficulties of trying
cases where evidence is withheld by governments looking to protect
their sources and methods, numerous terrorism trials in the United
States and Europe have similarly foundered over the years.

This month, for example, a London jury dealt a blow to
counterterrorism officials when it convicted three of eight defendants
of conspiracy to commit murder but failed to reach verdicts on the
more serious charge of a conspiracy to blow up seven airliners with
liquid explosives.

While no expert observer is willing to forecast this week’s verdict,
many agree that the Toronto 18 may be more a gang that could not shoot
straight than Canada’s first serious homegrown terrorist threat since
a group of Quebec separatists kidnapped a British diplomat and
kidnapped and killed a provincial cabinet minister in 1970.

“There was certainly a portrait drawn of this being a serious
terrorist cell involving a large number of individuals who had
bloodthirsty objectives,” said Wesley Wark, of the Munk Center for
International Studies at the University of Toronto. “We didn’t get a
chance to assess those claims until this trial. Then things became
instantly much murkier.”

Because the man on trial was 17 years old when arrested, he cannot be
identified under Canadian law. But evidence presented in court made it
clear that, at best, he was a minor character in the group, one who
appears to have been more interested in chopping firewood than in
jihad.

No matter how minor his role, though, the evidence presented in the
case presents a broad picture of the months leading to the raids,
which, the police said, were timed to prevent the group from acquiring
fertilizer to create bombs. The evidence was so broad that a court
order prevents the publication of the identities of other people
described in it to avoid prejudicing later trials.

The man, who was accused of participating in terrorist training, moved
to Canada from Sri Lanka in 1994 and was raised a Hindu. He converted
to Islam in high school and met many of his accused accomplices,
including a man prosecutors depict as the ringleader, at a mosque in
the Scarborough area of Toronto.

But there was no evidence offered directly linking the defendant to
the bomb plot or plans to storm Parliament. Instead, most of the case
focused on his attendance at two camps that the police described as
terrorist training sessions but that prosecution witnesses
characterized as recreational or religious retreats. Both were
videotaped by a paid police informant who was part of the group and
who testified that he choreographed some of the scenes.

Video from a camp north of Toronto in December 2005 shows a car
spinning around in a nearby, snow-covered parking lot. Prosecutors
characterized that as special driver training but the defense, and
many outsiders, said it was nothing more than “cutting doughnuts,” a
favorite winter pastime of young Canadian motorists. Other video from
the camp shows paintball fights, military clothing and members
marching with a group flag.

Government Thought Control on Trial in Canada

An important free speech case is underway in Canada.

Hate speech law creates ‘political elite’: lawyer

http://www.nationalpost.com/news/canada/story.html?id=794950

OAKVILLE – Canada’s human rights hate speech laws can, and eventually will, prohibit discussion of any historical conflict in which religion or race played a role, according to a leading defender of Canada’s most notorious far-right figures.

Doug Christie, addressing the hate speech hearing of freedomsite.orgWeb master Marc Lemire on behalf of the Canadian Free Speech League, said Section 13 of the Human Rights Act, which prohibits messages “likely to expose” identifiable groups to hatred, has created “a political elite who alone can communicate their views and decide who else can communicate.” Originally formulated for telephone hate lines, Section 13 now applies to the Internet and, by extension, a wide array of published material.

Hate-speech rule may be outdated in Internet age, adjudicator says

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20080916.RIGHTS16/TPStory/National

An adjudicator of a human-rights hearing involving an Internet hate case questioned yesterday whether a provision used to attack hate speech has any place in the Internet age.

The Human Rights Act provision permits anyone who objects to an Internet posting to expose the author to a costly, cumbersome human-rights adjudication process, said Athanasios Hadjis, who is presiding over a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal against webmaster Marc Lemire.

http://thebirdman.org/Index/Temp/Temp-MarcLemireCase–FinalPleadings-Fredrick.htm

From: Marc Lemire [mailto:marc@lemire.com]
Sent: Thursday, 18 September 2008 4:16 PM
To: marc@lemire.com
Subject: LEMIRE HEARING Day 3: AG admits Government Aim is Thought Control, and gives Hadjis a way out of ruling on Sec.13 Constitutionality

LEMIRE HEARING Day 3:

AG admits Government Aim is Thought Control, and gives Hadjis a way out of ruling on case. B’nai Brith: Those who live in glass houses should not throw rocks

“I’m Having to Defend the Telling of Jokes,” Miss Kulaszka Explained

OAKVILLE. September 17, 2008. Barbara Kulaszka victim Marc Lemire’s lawyer was up at the podium again today. She started off defending “jokes and trivia.” The law shouldn’t concern itself with ‘trivia. This law has gone mad.

“Making motions to this Tribunal is like going to a feminist convention and recommending that women stay home and home school and cook meals for their children. I wouldn’t want to go back to an era where I couldn’t be a lawyer and, yet, women going to work has meant children raised on junk food and a growing problem of obesity.”

Tribunal Member Hadjis argued that persistent off colour jokes in the workplace can be considered harassment. “But this isn’t the workplace,” Miss Kulaszka countered, “where you might have to put up with harassment day after day. Surfing the Internet and accessing a website where these jokes occur is voluntary.”

The application of this law is “totally political,” she charged. Harvey Goldberg, the head of the CHRC hate committee, “went to the Moslem community and urged them to lay complaints under Sec. 13. They said that the CHRC wouldn’t accept complaints from them. Well, in the Maclean’s case the CHRC didn’t accept the Moslems case. They were right.”

“There was no attempt to balance free speech with the application of this law,” Miss Kulaszka stated.

Mr. Hadjis interrupted her to argue that Parliament had passed such laws to protect certain minorities.

“This is a political persecution,” Miss Kulaszka charged.

“As to Mr. Warman’s credibility, Mr. Warman denied posting his complaints on a website called Recommnet. Dean Steacy said in investigating a complaint against that website Mr. Warman admitted he had posted that material” Miss Kulaszka explained.

Fothergill Says Thought Control is the Gov’t’s Aim

“Hate has not changed with the new technology of the Internet. Events in Rwanda and Darfur have only reinforced the scourge of hate speech.” Kurz argued that:.

“1. Hate speech remains harmful.
2. Canadian society must continue to strive to eliminate hate speech.”

“Hate speech strikes at the very core of a person’s identity and the trauma can last a lifetime,” he stated referencing Dr. Karen Mock’s report, but Mr. Hadjis corrected him saying that her report dealt mostly with assaults, not with postings on message boards.

“None of the shameful episodes in Canadian history, – the refusal to admit Jewish refugees, the internment of the Japanese – were not caused by censorship but by vilification,” Kurz insisted.

Mr. Kurz then turned to the hateful passages from B’nai Brith’s own website. Mr. Hadjis pointed out that intent didn’t matter.

One of the postings on the B’nai Brith “cooperative affiliation” sponsored, Nizkor Website read in part:

Fuck em. What have they done for the preservation and advancement

of the White race? They let the Jews crap all over our planet. They let

our schools be mongrelized with Niggers.

…

What have they passed on to us? Niggers dancing around on MTV with half

naked White women. A $5 trillion dollar debt. Public education is a joke.

A population that is over 30% non-White. Faggots infect our streets.

http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/m/ftp.py?people/m/metzger.tom/anon.1295

However, Mr. Kurz argued that the “effect” of the passage was all that mattered.

“The best way to deal with hate speech is before it becomes a cancer, using civil remedies like. Sec. 13 rather than the heavy hand of the Criminal Code,” Kurz stated, not reminding Mr. Hadjis that the fines and gag orders of Sec. 13 require a far lower level of proof than the Criminal Code.

After lunch, Barbara Kulaszka presented her rebuttal. She criticized B’nai Brith and Commission witness Karen Mock for their efforts to shut down debate. “She said she won’t debate ‘holocaust deniers or haters I urge you to look at the press editorials. The media is outraged by these attacks on freedom of speech.”

During his rebuttal, Simon Fothergill, arguing for the constitutionality of the Internet censorship law, seemed to retract his earlier charge against the defence that it was abusing the process by trying to revisit previous legal decisions: “Of course, things have changed because of the Internet.”

“Both Mr. Christie and Mr. Fromm took great exception to my comment about the Internet being used to organize and reinforce like minded opinions. We are concerned about permitting certain prejudicial attitudes to develop unchecked. That part of the conclusion is not determined by the Internet and should be treated as settled,” he argued.

“In terms of remedy, you are certainly entitled to consider the remedial nature and it would be a legal error to impose a penalty for a punitive purpose,” Mr. Fothergill added.

Citing press briefing papers when penalties were added to the Act in 1998, Mr. Fothergill spoke of the fines as “deterrents” to people using telephone answering machines and the Internet to expose privileged groups to “hatred” or “contempt.”

Mr. Fothergill urged the Tribunal not to consider media commentaries as uninformed and reflecting a bias, rather than, “as Miss Kulaszka said, the opinions of Canadians.’ I urge you to ignore the media commentaries that are filed as they are inherently unreliable.”

“The Commission plays a major role in filtering out complaints and seeing that an inadvertent slip on a message board, if measures are taken, may not lead to a Tribunal,” Mr. Fothergill said by way of reassurance.

Even Tribunal decisions may contain hateful statements, Mr. Fothergill admitted, but “context is everything.” Thus, presumably if B’nai Brith or the government posts hateful comments it’s alright; if a website with the wrong ideology says the same things, it’s off to Tribunals, gag orders, fines and maybe even prison for them.

Mr. Fothergill, recounting the numerous Commission abuses of Mr. Lemire’s rights, including the non attendance of Mr. Warman even for the final submissions, said Mr. Lemire should have sought judicial review, but, he added, “that if you feel the administration of justice would be brought into disrepute by these acts, you can dismiss the complaint, as Mr. Fromm, advocated, on those grounds.”

“If you consider these abuses that Mr. Lemire complains of – and I take no position on them – they are administrative and you can dismiss the complaint or stay the proceedings, rather than invalidate the legislation and the will of Parliament.”

Margot Blight then took over on behalf of the Commission. “It is submitted that the Commission uses common sense and the history of Sec. 13 referrals confirms that. If there is no need for a remedy, there is no need for the Tribunal to refer a case. It makes no sense to think the Commission would refer to a Tribunal a website that was being run properly.”

“When the Commission discovered very late in the day that the message board had been taken down in the Ouwendyk complaint, the Commission, withdrew its participation. It is the position that this law captures only the most extreme forms of speech.

Barbara Kulaszka offered a brief rebuttal to Ms Blight’s hour long response. She said when she sought a settlement, Mr. Warman summarily turned Mr. Lemire down stating that he “had dirty hands.”

“What a WHOIS search means we explained through our expert Mr. Klatt. The Commission called no rebuttal evidence,” she stated.

“I was astounded to hear Mr. Fothergill give you a way out, if you find this an abuse of protest, to dismiss this complaint without striking down the legislation,” she added.

“Our charts demonstrate that this Section is not being used in a remedial fashion. We rely on Tremaine and Lampman where letters of apology don’t work. Mr. Warman even posted Miss Lampman’s letter on one of those websites he calls ‘neo-Nazi.’ With respect to Mr. Vigna, I stand by my submissions. Mr. Steacy made it very clear Mr. Warman and Mr. Vigna knew who Jadewarr was,” she recalled.”The Commission’s ‘gatekeeper’ function is only to stop complaints against their friends, stakeholders or powerful people like Maclean’s,” she stated in her quiet forceful way.

“Thank you all, it’s been a long ride. I’m very overloaded. So, don’t expect anything soon,” Member Hadjis said in adjourning the hearing.

———————————————————–

PAYPAL: Donate now to help the Marc Lemire Constitutional Appeal

We desperately need your support to cover the legal bills and costs associated with this challenge of Internet Censorship

Canada’s Friend Israel

Israel is a good friend of Canada, the kind of friend that takes you out for a good time then drugs your drink and you wake up in chains.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3526.htm
Israeli assassins likely to pose as Canadians: expert

OTTAWA (CBC) – Israel is reported to have reactivated a unit known to
send agents posing as Canadian tourists to foreign countries to carry
out assassinations.
The Kidon Unit—named for the Hebrew word for bayonet—is part of
Israel’s overseas intelligence service, the Mossad.

Harper’s Israel-Grovelling Reaches New Low, Yet the Media Still Doesn’t Get It

Harper’s appeasement hits a new low, yet some still can’t grasp the fact that Canada is Zionist controlled. Is the opposition Zionist controlled as well?

“I guess my fear is what I see happening in some circles is (an) anti-Israeli sentiment, really just as a thinly disguised veil for good old-fashioned anti-Semitism, which I think is completely unacceptable,”Mr. Harper said in an interview with CJAD/CFRB radio.

Why is Harper working for the racist state of Israel? YayaCanada, an “alternative” Canadian internet news site, put it this way:

Harper’s blind support of Israeli policies is based partly on religious indoctrination, partly on directives from the US, and perhaps more importantly, his hope of “the Jewish vote” (a prejudicial term if ever there was one, suggesting that all Jews think with the same noodles).

Religious indoctrination and US appeasement(but what is the source of the pro-Israel sentiment of the US :-)) I can buy, but the “Jewish vote”? The folks at Yayacanada must be joking! The only Jewish votes that matter in a country where Jews are less than 2% of the population are those of the Zionist dominated media in Canada. The powerful Jews who own media are Zionists. Establishment Jews may have their disagreements but they are nearly always in agreement when it comes to irrational and treacherous, “unwavering” support of the world’s pariah, apartheid Israel.

Anyone that does not see that Zionists effectively control Canadian politics through their media domination is missing the big picture either through ignorance or malevolence. Politically ‘dissident’ sites like YayaCanada and ViveleCanada protect Zionists by covering the ‘other side’, but don’t reveal enough to actually expose the Zionists.

Whether it is political correctness(unforgiveable), ignorance(somewhat forgivable) or malfeasance(front groups), any Zionist protecting sites should be taken with a shaker of salt.

Even some pro-Palestinian blogs don’t really get it. There is no reasoning with Harper and the rest of the Bilderberg-vetted scum that dominate Canadian politics. Harper is not ignorant, he is fully aware of what he is doing and the powers he serves and it is time everyone woke up to it.

Here is an excerpt from an article discussing Harper’s latest subversion:

http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/canadas-ignorant-prime-minister/

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper recently made outrageously ignorant comments on the plight of the Palestinian people.

<his comments were ignorant, but Harper is not. He is evil.-@>

He claimed that criticism of and opposition to the Israeli policies of ethnic cleansing and apartheid against the Palestinian people amounted to “anti-Semitism.”

“Unfortunately, Israel at 60 remains a country under threat – threatened by those groups and regimes who deny to this day its right to exist,” Harper said in a Toronto celebration marking the inauspicious anniversary of Israel’s birth.

“And why? Look beyond the thinly veiled rationalizations; because they hate Israel, just as they hate the Jewish people.”

Obviously, Harper was trying to curry favor with Jews by appearing more Israeli and more Zionist than many Israelis themselves are.

<No, you are looking at this the wrong way. He is playing along with the Zionist agenda of endless war and attacks on civil rights and free speech. The only “Jews” he has to please are those who own/control outlets like CBC, CTV, Canwest-Global and the associated multimedia empires because they decide who stays in power -@narchore>

read the rest of a well-written article that unfortunately lacks insight into the Zionist power structure:

http://desertpeace.wordpress.com/2008/05/13/canadas-ignorant-prime-minister/

Know your real enemies, and act

Canada’s government has crossed the line and is actively working against Canadians’ interests on a number of different fronts. The corruption and scandals in the media are but the tip of the iceberg. Elitist Zionists along with Canada’s traditional plutocracy attend elitist conspiracy groups like Bilderberg, which vetted Stephen Harper and Stephane Dion and Paul Martin. They pick who we are allowed to vote for. Canada under the grip of global elitists and Zionists is a place where freedom of speech is hatecrime, war for Israel is the highest virtue, cures for cancer and other diseases are violently suppressed, alternative energy technology is violently suppressed, and the attack on the working people is in high gear.

by Xymphora

Predictable pathetic attempt from the Ottawa Citizen (owned by what type of Billionaire?) to explain why the Toronto 18 case is completely falling apart. Always remember that the entire point of all these cases is to convince people living in Western democracies that they share with Israel an imminent danger from ‘Islamofascists’. Thus we should all sign on to Bibi Netanyahu’s ‘war on terror’ – I keep stressing whose war this is as we can never forget that it was invented in an Israeli think tank in the late 80s – and allow Israel to kill Arabs and steal their land and water. Hundreds of years of the development of the protection of human rights, including the presumption of innocence and the need to have a smidgen of evidence before we ruin lives, is all to be thrown out the door so the highest representatives of the Tribe can have their fun.

To sum up the Toronto 18 case, there were 17 young Muslim men, who liked to play paintball in the woods, one older guy (the Osama bin Laden figure), and two agents provocateurs. The charges have now been dropped against the older guy, leaving the paintballers and the government agents. One of the government agents, a controversial fellow (always remembering ‘innocent until proven guilty’!), claims to have been paid a considerable amount of money for his efforts, and the other, an agricultural engineer, appears to have come up with the fertilizer which constitutes the entire basis of the terrorism case. It is well past the time to let all these victims of injustice go, and start disciplining – preferably by firing – the police and prosecutors involved in this travesty. Those officials who leaked information to the public in order to try the case by innuendo should be tracked down and prosecuted.

It is about time that Canadians, and others, discover who their real enemies are. One of the many reasons I am so hard on Zionism is that it constitutes a serious threat to everybody in the world, whether through wars or the destruction of civil rights. To give just another example: the single main threat to free speech in the West concerns efforts by Zionists to stop discussion of the many wrongs committed by Israel. People who continue to rely on political correctness to dodge the real issues here are morally responsible for the real harm that is being done to real people.

Barbara Kay Wants to Feel Safe

I was listening to CBC’s Cross Country Checkup, since it happened to be on, and I was feeling too lazy to switch it off.

Here is the program link in mp3 in case you are masochistically inclined: http://www.cbc.ca/checkup/archive/2008/080203CC.mp3
The topic was the US Republican and Democrat leadership race.

Consistent with the censorship inherent in Canada’s controlled media, there was praise for all the mainstream war candidates like Clinton, Obama and McCain, but they did not allow a single caller who was aware of Ron Paul, who is one of the remaining four Republican candidates.

Ron Paul is the only candidate of either group who is consistently against the Iraq war, wants to get rid of the IRS and the Federal Reserve, restore the constitution and get America out of foreign entaglements.

Of course the Oil/War/Bilderberg/Israel Lobby is on high alert when someone comes along and threatens to tip their cash cow, so Ron Paul is consistently cheated out of time in debates, and on ‘call-in’ shows like Cross-Country Checkup.

Cross-Country Checkup, which is obstensibly a call-in program where Canadians can weigh in on topics of the day is in reality a government information gatekeeper. Rex Murphy reprimanded a girl who called in during the beginning of the Iraq hostilities, and said that Bush was lying. Murphy, one of the gatekeepers for Canada’s plutocracy and global governance wing told her that Bush would not lie and that one should not say such things about George Bush. Of course 911 truth is not touched at all, except to condemn it as ‘ludicrous’ and ‘unthinkable’. Of course.

Yesterday’s show was no different in that the not-so-hidden powers controlling Canada were given their say. There were various guests, including one brilliant analyst who said that there is no point in debating issues because people don’t follow issues anyway, so we should just focus on superficialities. Then the neocon Barbara Kay was asked for her opinion, as though to provide ‘balance’ for the propaganda barrage I had just been witness to.

Kay’s qualifications are as an English teacher, but somehow this neocon columnist was selected as a reasonable voice for national radio. Why not ask a traditional conservative for their point of view? Traditional conservatives are evidently not pro-Israel enough. A true conservative might mention that Ron Paul is the best Republican for the job, but because Ron Paul is against foreign entanglements(ie Israel backing) and would reform the corrupt Federal Reserve system he is not mentioned by any mainstream media.

No, there are no conservatives allowed. The mainstream media including the CBC are in thrall to neoconservativism, what could be called ‘Israelism’, a fascist Zionist movement responsible for the Iraq war, and deeply involved in the 911 attacks.

Barbara Kay, a “Montreal-based columnist” for the National Post weighed in for McCain, because he would go after “the terrorists”.

Kay’s first priority is to be safe, and with a neocon warmonger in the US, we will be safe in Canada.

Now we know not to take statements like that from neocons at face value don’t we?

No, we see that Kay is in favour of the Iraq war, the Afghanistan war and war against Iran.

In fact, I could tell that about Ms Kay without hearing a word.

How do I know so much about her viewpoints?

The phrase, “Montreal-based columnist for the National Post” says it all.

Neoconservatives and Zionofascists within Canada, with their flagship newspaper the National Post, all have the same talking points and ideology. In fact this has been ordered by Izzy Asper, former owner of CanWest Global communications. Reporters that criticize Israel are fired.
They are pro-war, anti-speech, pro-police state(just like Israel) and always ready to play the “anti-semitism” card, lest anyone expose their perfidy.

Here she is going on about “Israel bashers”: http://www.barbarakay.ca/archive/20080130takingonisraelbashers.htm

Why is Cross Country Checkup giving this extremist airtime?

This isn’t Israel North, it is Canada!
related: http://theproles.blogspot.com/2006/08/one-more-round-against-barbara-kay.html

Zionofascists on Canada’s Supreme Court?

With Zionofascist-fomented wars threatening the world, can we afford to have a Zionist idealogue on the Supreme Court?

Rosalie Silberman Abella was appointed in 2004 by Paul Martin as part of the heavily Zionist-infiltrated Liberal Party of Canada’s pro-Israel agenda.

What kind of person is Mrs Abella? Is she a part of the pro-Israel Zionist Occupational Government taking over Canada’s institutions, or is she a competent judge who is impartial and just happens to be Jewish? Paul Martin would not have appointed a rabid Zionist to the Supreme Court, would he?

We don’t have to scratch her worship very hard to reveal some disturbing facts about Abella.

She is married to Irving Abella, former head of the Canadian Jewish Congress(CJC). The CJC is one of the many Israel Lobby groups operating in Canada. The agenda is anti-liberty, anti-speech and pro-war for Israel’s interests. They talk about human rights and protecting minorities, but in reality all they are concerned about is that Canada’s ZOG agents be above criticism under penalty of law.

The exerpt below from Canadian Jewish Outlook September-October 2007 describes the CJC tactic of labelling anyone that disagrees with Zionists and Israeli policy as antisemitic.

http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2007/09/25/1348/

Since 2002, the CJC has been treating any criticism of Israel as
an attack on all Jews: “Jews and Israel, Judaism and Zionism are
inextricably intertwined and an antisemitic attack on one is an
attack on the other.” ii It explicitly labels as anti-Semitic anyone
(Gentile or Jew) who criticizes Israeli policy or Zionism. Last summer,
as Israel rained destruction on Lebanon and the people of
Gaza, the CJC attacked the United Church of Canada as anti-
Semitic for considering a divestment motion in protest of Israeli war crimes.

What of Abella’s own views?

http://www.cjc.ca/ptemplate.php?Story=340&action=itn

Jul 05, 2003 – Globe and Mail

By: Madam Justice Rosalie Silberman Abella

A battle that never ends

Canada’s response to anti-Semitism assumes many forms. We have Criminal Code provisions and anti-discrimination human rights commissions to prevent hate crimes and propaganda; we have special hate crime units in our police forces; we have expansive Holocaust education programs; we have aggressive representative Jewish organizations like the Canadian Jewish Congress; we have a lively and generally supportive media; we have vigorous public debate; we have human rights education for a strong and independent judiciary, and we have a consistently- articulated public policy against anti-Semitism.

Well it didn’t take her long to plug the pernicious CJC, showing that her loyalties do not lie with Canada. I like the statement about the “generally supportive media”. No surprize there, with the media being owned by warmongering, pro-mass immigration, anti-liberty Zionofascists! She goes on to lament the new “anti-Semitism”:

This new anti-Semitism seems to have started after the Middle East peace talks broke down in 2000, took flight with the rampant racism at the UN Conference Against Racism at Durban, and spiralled out of control after 9/11. Once again, we hear demonizations and vitriol; once again, we are admonished to put it in context, and once again, we are urged as mature democracies to yield our anxieties over anti-Semitic speech to the centrality of freedom of expression.

That’s right, bitch! Because there really is no “antisemitic” speech that is not the result of Zionofascist scum like yourself, in reaction to your subverting our governments and institutions for the sake of your precious parasitic terrorist state Israel. No one criticizes Jews for being Jews, but for meddling on behalf of an alien state with values that are repugnant to us. And with the evidence that Israel was involved in 9/11, you can be sure that we are watching you very very closely.

In conclusion, we see that Abella is an Israel mole. She does not belong on the Supreme Court, and we are now seeing the deleterious effect of ZOG agents in Canada with the denial of US war resistors, and the endless warmongering.

http://www.cjc.ca/template.php?action=news&story=921

Dec 07, 2007 – CJC, UJA Federation launch “We Love Our Troops” pin campaign

OTTAWA – Dec. 7, 2008 – Canadian Jewish Congress, in conjunction with UJA Federation of Greater Toronto, proudly announce the launch of the free distribution of lapel pins with the messages “We Love Our Troops” and “Nous Aimons nos Troupes” at Giant Tiger stores, from coast to coast.

The idea for the pins flowed from the Remembrance Day ceremony in Ottawa last month, where Rabbi Reuven Bulka, co-President of CJC and Honourary Chaplain, Dominion Command, Royal Canadian Legion, roused the crowd in a chant of “We Love Our Troops.”

We are sick of it, and we can see the cause. Let them fight their battles themselves.

Three out of the nine Supreme Court judges are Jews. Three out of four of Canada’s most recent Supreme Court political appointees are Jews!

Fish, Morris Jacob                    Puisne Judge            2003.08.05        – Chrétien, Joseph Jacques Jean
Abella, Rosalie Silberman          Puisne Judge            2004.08.30        – Martin, Paul Edgar Philippe
Charron, Louise V.                   Puisne Judge            2004.08.30        – Martin, Paul Edgar Philippe
Rothstein, Marshall E.               Puisne Judge            2006.03.01        – Harper, Stephen Joseph

Zionofascism in Canada is accelerating. God help the country.

Related: http://www.canadianjusticereviewboard.ca/Judgement%20calls%20by%20David%20Warren.htm