Zionofascism Crippled

Just a Deleted WordPress.com weblog

Bakunin Is Right!

Posted by Anarchore on April 30, 2008

Mikhail Alexandrovich Bakunin, Father of Anarchism

“Everything about Bakunin is genuine: his struggle, sufferings and death. Everything about Marx is bogus

Many self-declared Anarchists today are afflicted with the bug of Cultural Marxism and Political Correctness. They read too many leftist communist publications and while they may in fact be against Israeli apartheid, will not identify Zionists pushing the Zionist neocon agenda in Canada and the US for fear of the label of “racism” or the dreaded “anti-semitism”.

The same ideology that implemented PC in the form of “human rights” commissions, institutional “anti-racism” and anti-speech laws was behind communism and is behind the current US/NATO fiasco/genocide in the middle east.  That ideology is the quasi religious/racial supremacist cult of Zionism.

Bakunin recognized the threat:

Bakunin on Marx and Rothschild
“Himself a Jew, Marx has around him, in London and France, but especially in Germany, a multitude of more or less clever, intriguing, mobile, speculating Jews, such as Jews are every where: commercial or banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades, with one foot in the bank, the other in the socialist movement, and with their behinds sitting on the German daily press — they have taken possession of all the newspapers — and you can imagine what kind of sickening literature they produce. Now, this entire Jewish world, which forms a single profiteering sect, a people of bloodsuckers, a single gluttonnous parasite, closely and intimately united not only across national borders but across all differences of political opinion — this Jewish world today stands for the most part at the disposal of Marx and at the same time at the disposal of Rothschild. I am certain that Rothschild for his part greatly values the merits of Marx, and that Marx for his part feels instinctive attraction and great respect for Rothschild.

This may seem strange. What can there be in common between Communism and the large banks? Oh! The Communism of Marx seeks enormous centralization in the state, and where such exists, there must inevitably be a central state bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, which. speculates on the work of the people, will always find a way to prevail ….”

Source: Michael Bakunin, 1871, Personliche Beziehungen zu Marx. In: Gesammelte Werke. Band 3. Berlin 1924. P. 204-216. [My translation – UD].

Bakunin was correct in his assessment about Zionist bankers and communists in collusion.  Jacob Schiff later gave 20 million dollars of New York Zionist banker money to Lev Bronstein, better known as Leon Trotsky.  The reign of Bolshevik terror led by Zionists subsequently killed 16 million Christians.

There you go.  Just as Bakunin had observed, the Zionist bankers and state communists were on the same team, with tragic consequences.

Now anarchists can put the old canard of anti-semitism to rest, and loudly proclaim, “Bakunin was right!” as we fight to thwart the ongoing and future rounds of Zionist genocide against gentiles.  The Zionists around the world do indeed constitute a “parasitic Jewish nation” as Bakunin describes them.

There is no need to say that the intellectual climate of the time was anti-semitic or some such excuse.

What Bakunin reveals is the truth of the International Jew as Henry Ford put it, and the pernicious hold of international Zionism we know today.

Advertisements

4 Responses to “Bakunin Is Right!”

  1. Patrick McNally said

    > Bolshevik terror led by Zionists subsequently killed 16 million Christians.

    That’s a discredited Cold War propaganda claim. Although the purges were ugly enough, with hundreds of thousands executed within a couple of years, there is nothing to supported the fable of 10+ million murdered by the Soviet state. See Archibald Getty & Oleg Naumov, THE ROAD TO TERROR, for a detailed account.

    What makes the reference to Bakunin so particularly silly is that the evolution of the Bolshevik party was very closely influenced by the experience of the Russian anarchists. Before the 1890s the main intellectual influences of Marx and Engels had been in Germany and Britain, not Russia. In Russia the anarchists were predominant on the Left and carried out a campaign of political assinations against officials with the expectation that a sufficient number of assassinations of officaldom would spark a revolution. It didn’t and the anarchists failed to develop any real contact with the people. They were ultimately suppressed by the Czarist police. That was when Marxism as an intellectual theory began to enter on the Left in Russia. But instead of breeding a revolutionary party it created a lot of groups of intellectuals who willingly consigned a socialist revolution to the far future under what they called the theory of two-stage revolution which postulated that first the bourgeoisie must carry of their own revolution and build capitalism, with the socialist revolution coming much later after that. It was in 1903 that Lenin became sufficiently dissatisfied with the way the Russian Social Democratic Party was developing that he began calling for the need to build a different type of party. Lenin’s model of how a real revolutionary party should work was quite explicitly taken from the Narodniki, the People’s Will, of Bakunin and Nechayev. The difference is that whereas the Narodniki had lacked all political and social theories, other than a vague belief that enough assassinations of government officials would trigger a spontaneous revolution, Lenin now required that party members should be trained in Marxist theory, while operating with the organizational means used by the Narodniki. Anyone who tries to separate the Bolsheviki from the past history of the Narodniki is unable to explain why such a party developed in Russia rather than in the countries where Marxist theory had traditionally had the most influence. Douglas Reed was simply being dishonest on this point, as he is on many others.

  2. Beserker said

    lol this whole page is pro-zionism

  3. Beserker said

    Anarchists are zionists by promoting mass immigratrion and being anti-nationalism

  4. anarchore said

    Not all anarchists Beserker! Most people who call themselves anarchists today are infected with PC and cultural marxism.. Bakunin would give them a kick in their arse! Remember anarchy means “without government”, so an agenda imposed by Marxists/Leninists should be categorically rejected by real anarchists.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: